FACTS KEPT SEPARATE FROM HYPOTHESES · TOLD HONESTLY
{{ statusLabel }}
INC · place-inference
Low-confidence place inference, caught before approval
The Trust gate stopped a shaky place label from being attached to the Otaru Living Day. Nothing was published; the day stays private.
CURRENT EXPOSURE
None
Private, on device. No people affected — nothing was published.
FOLLOW-UP RECEIPT
WHATPlace inference held
PREVENTEDwrong place on the day
EXPOSUREnone — unpublished
REVERSIBLEyes — stays a gap
RECORDEDon device · nothing sent
WHAT CHANGED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE
VERIFIEDThe correct-before-approval gate is live — it caught this one.
PLANNEDExtend low-confidence holds to every place inference — not yet shipped.
VEDA HEARD
“what was actually verified here?”
confirm first
ALTERNATE STATE · NOT CURRENT — ROOT CAUSE UNKNOWN. THE FACTS AND THE COMPETING HYPOTHESES ARE SHOWN; NO CONCLUSION IS CLAIMED.
WHAT WE KNOW · KEPT SEPARATE
VERIFIED FACTS
✓The place inference is low-confidence.
✓Nothing was published.
✓The Otaru day is private, on device.
✓No wrong place was attached to any outward artifact.
?HYPOTHESIS · NOT A FACT
Which place is correct is a hypothesis, not established:
Otaru Canal
route trace · 16:52
or
Sakaimachi Street
photo #9
Veda does not know which is correct, and will not guess.
SEQUENCE · TIMES ONLY WHEN SOURCED
{{ t.title }}
{{ t.detail }}
{{ t.time }}
EVIDENCE
{{ e.title }}
{{ e.detail }}
{{ e.tag }}
ACTIONS TAKEN
Gate held the inference before approval.
Flagged for owner correction.
Dusk beat kept as an open gap.
ROOT-CAUSE STATUS
IDENTIFIED
Two real sources disagree on the place, so the inference correctly scored itself low and the gate held it. This is the gate working as intended — a caught near-miss, not a failure to fix.
UNDER INVESTIGATION · NO CONCLUSION
Veda has not concluded why the ambiguity arose. Competing explanations, none confirmed:
H1
The two sources genuinely conflict — ground truth is ambiguous.
H2
One source is mislabeled — e.g. a photo’s location is off.
H3
The inference over-weighted a weak signal.
ACTIVE INVESTIGATION — comparing the route-trace time against the photo’s capture data. No conclusion yet; the incident stays open until one holds up.
CONTAINMENT
Held behind the correct-before-approval gate. The dusk beat stays an open gap — nothing attaches until you decide.
Trust — this incident
Verified facts are shown apart from hypotheses. A hypothesis is never dressed up as a fact.
Timing, affected outcomes and people appear only when a source backs them. Otherwise: none, or unavailable.
Every incident closes with what changed — and whether that change is planned or verified.